-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Customers architecture #4590
Customers architecture #4590
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for webThis analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖 New Pages AddedThe following pages were added to the bundle from the code in this PR:
One Hundred Sixteen Pages Changed SizeThe following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:
DetailsOnly the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip. First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the The "Budget %" column shows what percentage of your performance budget the First Load total takes up. For example, if your budget was 100kb, and a given page's first load size was 10kb, it would be 10% of your budget. You can also see how much this has increased or decreased compared to the base branch of your PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this. If you see "+/- <0.01%" it means that there was a change in bundle size, but it is a trivial enough amount that it can be ignored. |
5841849
to
33c981f
Compare
def _get_readable_customer_statement( | ||
self, auth_subject: AuthSubject[User | Organization] | ||
) -> Select[tuple[Customer]]: | ||
statement = select(Customer).where(Customer.deleted_at.is_(None)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We may need to allow to list deleted customers to get historical data.
93ae45f
to
477d2b1
Compare
7b5bd6a
to
9752b93
Compare
9752b93
to
310a815
Compare
310a815
to
df1d8dd
Compare
df1d8dd
to
9a3d529
Compare
9a3d529
to
3094c39
Compare
3094c39
to
8f0e091
Compare
We already have a token at hand which should be enough to prove access
…tter with User/Customer sessions
…r session from the web
…onfirmation email
Ease migration from Users. Also fixes the logic that were trying to tie a payment Transaction to a Customer/User. It was simply not working because most of the time, the Customer/User didn't exist at the time of handling the transaction. Now, we link it when handling the Order, which already had some logic to update that Transaction.
The builtin EventSource class doesn't support to pass custom headers to the request, like Authorization. From what I read, this class is somewhat deprecated and browser developers encourage to use `fetch` instead. The thing is, it's a much lower level API which doesn't do the work of reading and parsing the stream. Ref: whatwg/html#2177 I found `event-source-plus`, a library which does all that work on top of `fetch`.
…on checkout success
ae05ca5
to
98b2e29
Compare
Suspect IssuesThis pull request was deployed and Sentry observed the following issues:
Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎 |
No description provided.